CSNbbs
University of Cincinnati Expects Record Enrollment in Fall 2017 - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: Archives (/forum-400.html)
+----- Forum: AACbbs Archives (/forum-418.html)
+------ Forum: Cincinnati Archives (/forum-932.html)
+------ Thread: University of Cincinnati Expects Record Enrollment in Fall 2017 (/thread-820175.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


RE: University of Cincinnati Expects Record Enrollment in Fall 2017 - Bearcat 1985 - 07-26-2017 03:09 PM

(07-26-2017 02:47 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  
(07-26-2017 02:43 PM)KnightLight Wrote:  
(06-15-2017 02:24 PM)bearcatseminole Wrote:  As a higher-ed professional, the spin on this is interesting. Growth is definitely important, but so is retention. It's easy to put out these numbers and feel good about UC's prospects, but at the same time, some additional information would paint a much clearer picture.

Other pieces of information that would have been helpful:
- 1st year retention rate (from the previous year)
- 5-6 year graduation rate

Here's info from UC's 2016-2017 Common Data Set.
https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/provost/docs/institutional_research/student_reports/common_data_sets/Current_UC_Common_Data_Set.pdf

Notes:

6 year grad rate for incoming students 2009: 65%
6 year grad rate for incoming students 2010: 67%

Freshmen Retention Rate 2015: 87.9%

Plus other interesting info in regards to applications received, acceptance rate, enrollment rate, test scores, etc...

Everything I've heard from their office in meetings I've had with their leadership makes me think they're seeing numbers tracking towards 90% which is an extremely good number this coming year. For reference, the national average is around 70%, give or take, depending on the year.

It's also important because retention and graduation rates now trigger extra funding from the state.


RE: University of Cincinnati Expects Record Enrollment in Fall 2017 - BearcatMan - 07-26-2017 03:17 PM

(07-26-2017 03:09 PM)Bearcat 1985 Wrote:  
(07-26-2017 02:47 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  
(07-26-2017 02:43 PM)KnightLight Wrote:  
(06-15-2017 02:24 PM)bearcatseminole Wrote:  As a higher-ed professional, the spin on this is interesting. Growth is definitely important, but so is retention. It's easy to put out these numbers and feel good about UC's prospects, but at the same time, some additional information would paint a much clearer picture.

Other pieces of information that would have been helpful:
- 1st year retention rate (from the previous year)
- 5-6 year graduation rate

Here's info from UC's 2016-2017 Common Data Set.
https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/provost/docs/institutional_research/student_reports/common_data_sets/Current_UC_Common_Data_Set.pdf

Notes:

6 year grad rate for incoming students 2009: 65%
6 year grad rate for incoming students 2010: 67%

Freshmen Retention Rate 2015: 87.9%

Plus other interesting info in regards to applications received, acceptance rate, enrollment rate, test scores, etc...

Everything I've heard from their office in meetings I've had with their leadership makes me think they're seeing numbers tracking towards 90% which is an extremely good number this coming year. For reference, the national average is around 70%, give or take, depending on the year.

It's also important because retention and graduation rates now trigger extra funding from the state.

Yep...only about 50% of funding is based on immediate headcount these days. That's why you'll see more than a few 4-years in Ohio be down in headcount but up in academic quality indicators this year.


RE: University of Cincinnati Expects Record Enrollment in Fall 2017 - grubs - 07-27-2017 12:23 PM

(07-26-2017 02:27 PM)TubaCat Wrote:  
(07-26-2017 01:33 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(07-24-2017 02:33 PM)Fubar Wrote:  https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2017/07/21/lawsuit-accuses-uc-of-anti-male-bias.html

An update on this story, the girl who alleged she was raped has now filed a separate action against UC for "deliberate indifference to student-on-student assault". In other words, she is alleging UC failed to get the accused off campus in a timely manner.

This girl is seeking financial compensation for UC not expelling this student (who was never convicted of a crime) fast enough.

We as a society are very fortunate to have so many selfless lawyers willing to pursue "justice," while only asking for money in return.
It wouldn't be surprising to see UC lose or settle both sides of this. That's the current state of Title IX.