Stanford vs. Rice - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html) +---- Forum: Members (/forum-401.html) +----- Forum: Rice (/forum-444.html) +----- Thread: Stanford vs. Rice (/thread-791559.html) Pages: 1 2 |
RE: Stanford vs. Rice - Bailiff_Lingo_Bingo - 09-21-2016 12:20 AM (09-20-2016 11:43 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote:(09-20-2016 10:32 PM)cr11owl Wrote:(09-20-2016 06:56 PM)ExcitedOwl18 Wrote:(09-20-2016 06:05 PM)Barrett Wrote: I would say the PRIMARY difference between Stanford and Rice is the on-field product quality. There are other differences, surely, but that is the glaring one. If our product were just as good as Stanford's, Rice students would care more about Rice football. I can guarantee you that there are plenty of Rice students watching college football on Saturdays on their TVs in their colleges. They love college football. They just aren't interested in poor quality football. Definitely w/ Excited on this one. RE: Stanford vs. Rice - Da.Owl - 09-21-2016 12:26 AM (09-20-2016 04:00 PM)Barrett Wrote: Morale on this Board is low, which is understandable. We're 0-3 during conference realignment talks and at a time when our intra-city rival, UH, is enjoying a wave of success and looks poised to jumping to a P5 conference. People here are p-ssed off, and not surprisingly so. Valid points, Barrett. I'd also offer that it's more than current students in tbe seats at home, it's how well Rice travels. Rice doesn't have as much rubber meeting the road as the P5s. |