+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: Members (/forum-401.html)
+----- Forum: MemphisTigers.org (/forum-446.html)
+------ Forum: Dockery-Finch Memorial Tiger Sports Forum (/forum-499.html)
+------ Thread: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era (/thread-729006.html)
Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - bluebacker - 03-02-2015 05:58 PM
2009 - 2010 (0-4)
#1 Kansas L57-55 (N)
#14 Tenneseess L66-59
@#7 Syracuse L74-57
#17 Gonzaga L66-58
2010 - 2011 (0-3)
#4 Kansas (N) L81-68
#10 Georgetown L86-69
#17 Arizona (N) L77-75
2011 - 2012 (0-3)
#15 Michigan (N) L73-61
@#4 Louisville L95-87
@#16 Georgetown L70-59
2012 - 2013 (1-2)
#6 Louisville L87-78
#25 St. Marys (N) W54-52
#9 Michigan State (N) L70-48
2013-2014 (5-6)
@#7 Oklahoma State L101-80
#5 Oklahoma State (N) W73-68
#16 Florida (N) L77-75
@#12 Louisville W73-67
#23 Gonzaga W60-54
#24 UConn L86-81 OT
#7 Louisville W72-66
@#15 Cincinnati L97-84
#18 SMU W67-58
#21 UConn L72-53
#3 Virginia (N) 78-60
2014 - 2015 (0-3)
#11 Wichita State L71-56
@#3 Gonzaga L82-64
#21 SMU L66-57
Total Record 6 - 21
(St. Marys was not listed as a Top 25 win by Wiki but I'm counting it)
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - hollywoodtigerhound - 03-02-2015 06:01 PM
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media.giphy.com/media/9aXNIJ22JQpvG/giphy.gif)
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - Chi-Town - 03-02-2015 07:02 PM
Again? What is the point?
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - bluebacker - 03-02-2015 09:55 PM
(03-02-2015 07:02 PM)Chi-Town Wrote: Again? What is the point?
Misinformation tends to float around.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - ddramone - 03-02-2015 10:07 PM
I have to say that 2013-2014 will be the thing that saves CJP's job into next year. There's just enough there - combined with AN's season-ending injury - to keep him here through next year. The 2013-2014 record I really thought was a signal that CJP had improved. Turns out that it was simply having a really good, experienced backcourt with Joe, Crawford, Dixon and Geron that did the trick.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - Phillip26r - 03-02-2015 10:22 PM
What happened to the JMS thread about attendance?
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - Obsidian - 03-02-2015 10:58 PM
(03-02-2015 10:22 PM)Phillip26r Wrote: What happened to the JMS thread about attendance?
http://www.csnbbs.com/thread-728791.html
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - Ramen_Tiger - 03-02-2015 11:01 PM
Why don't all the Fans who want him gone start a petition. It worked with Cuonzo.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - MTigerBlue - 03-02-2015 11:29 PM
How about some predictions for this stat next year.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - snowtiger - 03-02-2015 11:48 PM
I wouldn't mind some weatherman threads a la Mem.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - hsvtiger - 03-02-2015 11:49 PM
(03-02-2015 05:58 PM)bluebacker Wrote: 2009 - 2010 (0-4)
#1 Kansas L57-55 (N)
#14 Tenneseess L66-59
@#7 Syracuse L74-57
#17 Gonzaga L66-58
2010 - 2011 (0-3)
#4 Kansas (N) L81-68
#10 Georgetown L86-69
#17 Arizona (N) L77-7
2011 - 2012 (0-3)
#15 Michigan (N) L73-61
@#4 Louisville L95-87
@#16 Georgetown L70-59
2012 - 2013 (1-2)
#6 Louisville L87-78
#25 St. Marys (N) W54-52
#9 Michigan State (N) L70-48
2013-2014 (5-6)
@#7 Oklahoma State L101-80
#5 Oklahoma State (N) W73-68
#16 Florida (N) L77-75
@#12 Louisville W73-67
#23 Gonzaga W60-54
#24 UConn L86-81 OT
#7 Louisville W72-66
@#15 Cincinnati L97-84
#18 SMU W67-58
#21 UConn L72-53
#3 Virginia (N) 78-60
2014 - 2015 (0-3)
#11 Wichita State L71-56
@#3 Gonzaga L82-64
#21 SMU L66-57
Total Record 6 - 21
(St. Marys was not listed as a Top 25 win by Wiki but I'm counting it)
That really is a poor record: 6-21. Making matters worse is the fact that 12 of the 21 losses were double-digit. i am not bashing anyone, but a program that thinks of itself as higher-level has got to do better than that.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - 80sTiger - 03-03-2015 12:19 AM
10 15+ point blowouts < 2 years, and counting. 3 of 5 200+ RPI losses in last 36 years.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - KnightLight - 03-03-2015 08:05 AM
(03-02-2015 07:02 PM)Chi-Town Wrote: Again? What is the point?
Just taking a guess...its because that Pastner is paid like a Top 20-25 Coach but it looks like he doesn't deserve to be paid as such.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - ZachMan - 03-03-2015 08:23 AM
(03-03-2015 08:05 AM)KnightLight Wrote:(03-02-2015 07:02 PM)Chi-Town Wrote: Again? What is the point?
Just taking a guess...its because that Pastner is paid like a Top 20-25 Coach but it looks like he doesn't deserve to be paid as such.
This is one of the big sore spots here is that he is paid in the top 10-15 in the country but we do not get those results. This thread is simply to combat the hundreds on him being the in the Top 10 wins in his first 6 years. We all know that he beats the bad opponents and loses to anyone good and this year he has started to add the bad to the list of losses. There is also some belief that Josh is the only coach we could ever hire so we need to keep him. All so very frustrating!!!
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - wylioats - 03-03-2015 09:08 AM
C'mon guys. We all know that Josh will get it done in YEAR #7. Josh said himself, they better get us this year, because next year, yada, yada, yada. So stop being negative nellies and start being positive pauls.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - tigersgrizzfan - 03-03-2015 09:12 AM
wow
somebody post those numbers from The Morning Rush this morning...
it is amazing how much we are over paying......
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - HoopDreams - 03-03-2015 09:14 AM
(03-03-2015 09:12 AM)tigersgrizzfan Wrote: wow
somebody post those numbers from The Morning Rush this morning...
it is amazing how much we are over paying......
Go look at who the actual wins are against if you want to really be ill.
79.6% of the wins are against OOC donkeys or CUSA/AAC trash.
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - tigersgrizzfan - 03-03-2015 09:14 AM
(03-03-2015 08:23 AM)ZachMan Wrote:(03-03-2015 08:05 AM)KnightLight Wrote:(03-02-2015 07:02 PM)Chi-Town Wrote: Again? What is the point?
Just taking a guess...its because that Pastner is paid like a Top 20-25 Coach but it looks like he doesn't deserve to be paid as such.
This is one of the big sore spots here is that he is paid in the top 10-15 in the country but we do not get those results. This thread is simply to combat the hundreds on him being the in the Top 10 wins in his first 6 years. We all know that he beats the bad opponents and loses to anyone good and this year he has started to add the bad to the list of losses. There is also some belief that Josh is the only coach we could ever hire so we need to keep him. All so very frustrating!!!
the only person that believes that is his lover..... Garry Parrish
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - bluebacker - 03-03-2015 10:29 AM
(03-03-2015 09:14 AM)HoopDreams Wrote:(03-03-2015 09:12 AM)tigersgrizzfan Wrote: wow
somebody post those numbers from The Morning Rush this morning...
it is amazing how much we are over paying......
Go look at who the actual wins are against if you want to really be ill.
79.6% of the wins are against OOC donkeys or CUSA/AAC trash.
Isn't that pretty much true of most upper level programs? Does anyone know how that percentage would compare to say Gonzaga, Kansas, and maybe Florida?
RE: Against Ranked teams in the Pastner Era - HoopDreams - 03-03-2015 10:30 AM
(03-03-2015 10:29 AM)bluebacker Wrote:(03-03-2015 09:14 AM)HoopDreams Wrote:(03-03-2015 09:12 AM)tigersgrizzfan Wrote: wow
somebody post those numbers from The Morning Rush this morning...
it is amazing how much we are over paying......
Go look at who the actual wins are against if you want to really be ill.
79.6% of the wins are against OOC donkeys or CUSA/AAC trash.
Isn't that pretty much true of most upper level programs? Does anyone know how that percentage would compare to say Gonzaga, Kansas, and maybe Florida?
Maybe OOC for some, but most upper level programs have better leagues for sure, especially better than CUSA.