+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: College Sports and Conference Realignment (/forum-637.html)
+---- Thread: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings (/thread-693671.html)
Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Bearcats#1 - 06-29-2014 08:06 AM
You love to rip UC for being "small time/g5"...
2015 Football Recruiting Class Rankings on 247 Sports as of this morning:
Cincy: #35
Texas Tech: #44
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
PS: Thanks for the coach, he and Eddie Gran are tearing up the recruiting trail!
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - jml2010 - 06-29-2014 09:19 AM
(06-29-2014 08:06 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote: You love to rip UC for being "small time/g5"...
2015 Football Recruiting Class Rankings on 247 Sports as of this morning:
Cincy: #35
Texas Tech: #44
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
PS: Thanks for the coach, he and Eddie Gran are tearing up the recruiting trail!
LOL----- in June-- 7-8 months away from signing day. Give em the national championship boy because 1 publication has them ahead of Texas Tech in freaking June.
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&yr=2015
Quote:32. Texas Tech 7 Big 12 914 2 0 4 2 5 2 0 6 1 3.43
50. Cincinnati 15 AAC 578 0 0 0 8 4 11 0 15 0 2.53
http://sports.yahoo.com/footballrecruiting/football/recruiting/teamrank/2015/all/all
Quote:#42 Texas Tech 7 0 2 5 3.29 656
#44 Cincinnati 16 0 0 4 2.31 615
Lets revisit this thread in Feb----- thanks
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Kittonhead - 06-29-2014 09:30 AM
I don't think the AAC is hurt too much on the recruiting trail by not being part of the P5. As a group of football schools the AAC consists of members who have been past of outright major conferences in the past like the Big East or SWC and tweener independents likes Memphis, ECU and Navy.
Schools that have been traditionally considered as part of that Top 80 club and accepted alternatives to playing at lower tier SEC/B1G/ACC schools. The labels have changed to P5/G5 but someone has to be that 6th best conference and the AAC with each season is starting to pull away from the pack.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - TexanMark - 06-29-2014 09:39 AM
(06-29-2014 09:30 AM)Kittonhead Wrote: I don't think the AAC is hurt too much on the recruiting trail by not being part of the P5. As a group of football schools the AAC consists of members who have been past of outright major conferences in the past like the Big East or SWC and tweener independents likes Memphis, ECU and Navy.
Schools that have been traditionally considered as part of that Top 80 club and accepted alternatives to playing at lower tier SEC/B1G/ACC schools. The labels have changed to P5/G5 but someone has to be that 6th best conference and the AAC with each season is starting to pull away from the pack.
Basically agreed...they will assume the role that Big East had for the most part. I see them with good talent evaluation select teams to be able to compete for the Top 25...rarely the Top 10.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Miami (Oh) Yeah ! - 06-29-2014 09:46 AM
Western Michigan #49
College of Clifton, Cincinnati #50
Miami O #58
ECU #85
UConn #94
Gonna pass Clifton along with half the MAC
MAC out-recruiting AAC according to conference ratings. MAC highest rated out of MWC, AAC, SBC, C-USA
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Kittonhead - 06-29-2014 09:46 AM
(06-29-2014 09:39 AM)TexanMark Wrote:(06-29-2014 09:30 AM)Kittonhead Wrote: I don't think the AAC is hurt too much on the recruiting trail by not being part of the P5. As a group of football schools the AAC consists of members who have been past of outright major conferences in the past like the Big East or SWC and tweener independents likes Memphis, ECU and Navy.
Schools that have been traditionally considered as part of that Top 80 club and accepted alternatives to playing at lower tier SEC/B1G/ACC schools. The labels have changed to P5/G5 but someone has to be that 6th best conference and the AAC with each season is starting to pull away from the pack.
Basically agreed...they will assume the role that Big East had for the most part. I see them with good talent evaluation select teams to be able to compete for the Top 25...rarely the Top 10.
That's true. They also have the financial ability to pay coaches 2 or 3 million dollars so they'll stick around and build programs. If they can average 2 Top 25 finishers in football every year they'll be able to reopen that TV contract and possibly attract BYU to get even stronger. Unless they get raided first of a few programs.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Miami (Oh) Yeah ! - 06-29-2014 09:53 AM
![[Image: BpKLDGuCQAI7bMM.png]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BpKLDGuCQAI7bMM.png)
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - TexanMark - 06-29-2014 09:58 AM
(06-29-2014 09:53 AM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote:
What is the source? BTW, look at average star rating...that means something.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - EerMeNow - 06-29-2014 10:05 AM
(06-29-2014 09:53 AM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote:
"Those sanctions are going to destroy Penn State"
-- Eermenow, 2012
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - jml2010 - 06-29-2014 10:20 AM
(06-29-2014 09:58 AM)TexanMark Wrote:(06-29-2014 09:53 AM)Miami (Oh) Yeah ! Wrote:
What is the source? BTW, look at average star rating...that means something.
Its from scout. Here is the updated version at 11am ET
http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&view=2&yr=2015
Quote:1. SEC 13.4 1. Alabama 1679 21 6 76 96 102 80 5 178 9 3.42
2. Big Ten 10.8 4. Penn State 993 3 1 36 85 88 61 2 150 1 3.05
3. Big 12 9.1 15. Texas 842 5 0 26 50 51 39 1 82 9 3.12
4. ACC 12.1 5. Clemson 797 3 2 18 116 92 75 3 169 1 2.93
5. Indep 7.7 8. Notre Dame 789 3 0 6 16 8 14 1 23 0 3.22
6. Pac-12 7.4 13. USC 736 9 3 20 53 55 31 3 80 9 3.13
7. MAC 7.8 49. Western Michigan 193 0 0 0 22 53 46 2 101 0 2.06
8. AAC 5.6 50. Cincinnati 176 0 0 0 27 37 30 0 66 1 2.39
9. Conf USA 6.2 52. Rice 167 0 0 0 22 45 42 0 86 1 2.15
10. MWC 3.7 53. Boise State 133 0 0 1 18 24 20 0 39 5 2.41
11. Sun Belt 2.7 65. Arkansas State 80 0 0 0 9 16 13 1 27 3 2.27
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Big Frog II - 06-29-2014 11:26 AM
I think I would wait until signing date before bragging about my recruiting. It's like bragging about football rankings in June.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Pony94 - 06-29-2014 11:27 AM
http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2014-06-28/battle-hit-face-tech-football-recruit#.U7A-E7GGf1C
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Cali_Cat - 06-29-2014 01:13 PM
Why even post this??? You are embarrassing the UC fanbase.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - stxrunner - 06-29-2014 01:34 PM
Bushleague much? What is wrong with you Bearcats#1? No UC fan should give 2 hoots about Tech's recruting, especially if you are talking ratings which aren't exactly the pinnacle of accuracy.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - NBPirate - 06-29-2014 01:41 PM
Using Scout for recruiting? Lol, I didn't even know that site still existed. They base it all on who has the most subscriptions. 247 is the best around.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - jml2010 - 06-29-2014 02:01 PM
(06-29-2014 11:27 AM)Pony94 Wrote: http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2014-06-28/battle-hit-face-tech-football-recruit#.U7A-E7GGf1C
Kliff won't tolerate that crap and he was immediately kicked off the team. He might find a home in Waco or Dallas.
RE: Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - Bearcats#1 - 06-29-2014 02:23 PM
(06-29-2014 01:34 PM)stxrunner Wrote: Bushleague much? What is wrong with you Bearcats#1? No UC fan should give 2 hoots about Tech's recruting, especially if you are talking ratings which aren't exactly the pinnacle of accuracy.
hahaha I know it's worthless....it's just so much fun to get JML going hahahaha
Hey JML: Recruiting Class Rankings - 1845 Bear - 06-29-2014 02:49 PM
Both sides ( AAC and JML) need to keep from posting bait threads. I'm closing this since it's only going to lead nowhere.