CSNbbs
The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - Printable Version

+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html)
+---- Forum: The Kyra Memorial Spin Room (/forum-540.html)
+---- Thread: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit (/thread-688428.html)

Pages: 1 2


The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - oklalittledixie - 05-05-2014 07:17 PM

- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday gave local government officials across the United States more leeway to begin public meetings with a prayer, ruling that sectarian invocations do not automatically violate the U.S. Constitution.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/05/us-usa-court-prayer-idUSBREA440FO20140505


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - john01992 - 05-05-2014 07:51 PM

it was a vote that went along party lines. we havent seen the last of this one.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - oklalittledixie - 05-05-2014 07:53 PM

(05-05-2014 07:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  it was a vote that went along party lines. we havent seen the last of this one.

Although the ruling referred only to legislative prayer, it could give a boost to government officials seeking to promote religion in public life in other contexts, such as sectarian religious displays in civic buildings.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - john01992 - 05-05-2014 07:55 PM

(05-05-2014 07:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  it was a vote that went along party lines. we havent seen the last of this one.

Although the ruling referred only to legislative prayer, it could give a boost to government officials seeking to promote religion in public life in other contexts, such as sectarian religious displays in civic buildings.

you sure would love to see being a christian as a requirement for being able to vote/run for public office would you??????


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - oklalittledixie - 05-05-2014 07:57 PM

(05-05-2014 07:55 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  it was a vote that went along party lines. we havent seen the last of this one.

Although the ruling referred only to legislative prayer, it could give a boost to government officials seeking to promote religion in public life in other contexts, such as sectarian religious displays in civic buildings.

you sure would love to see being a christian as a requirement for being able to vote/run for public office would you??????

If they feel uncomfortable joining the prayer, they can have a moment of reflection instead


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - john01992 - 05-05-2014 08:01 PM

(05-05-2014 07:57 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:55 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  it was a vote that went along party lines. we havent seen the last of this one.

Although the ruling referred only to legislative prayer, it could give a boost to government officials seeking to promote religion in public life in other contexts, such as sectarian religious displays in civic buildings.

you sure would love to see being a christian as a requirement for being able to vote/run for public office would you??????

If they feel uncomfortable joining the prayer, they can have a moment of reflection instead

answer my question plz


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - oklalittledixie - 05-05-2014 08:05 PM

(05-05-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:57 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:55 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  it was a vote that went along party lines. we havent seen the last of this one.

Although the ruling referred only to legislative prayer, it could give a boost to government officials seeking to promote religion in public life in other contexts, such as sectarian religious displays in civic buildings.

you sure would love to see being a christian as a requirement for being able to vote/run for public office would you??????

If they feel uncomfortable joining the prayer, they can have a moment of reflection instead

answer my question plz

not at all. But I would like to see many more restrictions put on voting.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - john01992 - 05-05-2014 08:08 PM

(05-05-2014 08:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:57 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:55 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Although the ruling referred only to legislative prayer, it could give a boost to government officials seeking to promote religion in public life in other contexts, such as sectarian religious displays in civic buildings.

you sure would love to see being a christian as a requirement for being able to vote/run for public office would you??????

If they feel uncomfortable joining the prayer, they can have a moment of reflection instead

answer my question plz

not at all. But I would like to see many more restrictions put on voting.

like being required to own property?


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - oklalittledixie - 05-05-2014 08:10 PM

(05-05-2014 08:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:57 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:55 PM)john01992 Wrote:  you sure would love to see being a christian as a requirement for being able to vote/run for public office would you??????

If they feel uncomfortable joining the prayer, they can have a moment of reflection instead

answer my question plz

not at all. But I would like to see many more restrictions put on voting.

like being required to own property?

like being able to pass an intelligence test and more fool proof identification. I would like to see an end to absentee ballots...regardless of who is using them.

Now back to the topic.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - john01992 - 05-05-2014 08:14 PM

(05-05-2014 08:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 07:57 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  If they feel uncomfortable joining the prayer, they can have a moment of reflection instead

answer my question plz

not at all. But I would like to see many more restrictions put on voting.

like being required to own property?

like being able to pass an intelligence test and more fool proof identification. I would like to see an end to absentee ballots...regardless of who is using them.

Now back to the topic.

please elaborate on this "intelligence test"

does it include knowing about bible passages?


The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - GrayBeard - 05-05-2014 10:18 PM

(05-05-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:01 PM)john01992 Wrote:  answer my question plz

not at all. But I would like to see many more restrictions put on voting.

like being required to own property?

like being able to pass an intelligence test and more fool proof identification. I would like to see an end to absentee ballots...regardless of who is using them.

Now back to the topic.

please elaborate on this "intelligence test"

does it include knowing about bible passages?

Why are you so scared of the Bible?




Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - mathenis89 - 05-05-2014 10:34 PM

(05-05-2014 10:18 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:05 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  not at all. But I would like to see many more restrictions put on voting.

like being required to own property?

like being able to pass an intelligence test and more fool proof identification. I would like to see an end to absentee ballots...regardless of who is using them.

Now back to the topic.

please elaborate on this "intelligence test"

does it include knowing about bible passages?

Why are you so scared of the Bible?




Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Because it's misinterpreted and used to oppress those who may not agree with the views of those who use it as a weapon.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - Paul M - 05-05-2014 10:37 PM

(05-05-2014 10:34 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 10:18 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:10 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  
(05-05-2014 08:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  like being required to own property?

like being able to pass an intelligence test and more fool proof identification. I would like to see an end to absentee ballots...regardless of who is using them.

Now back to the topic.

please elaborate on this "intelligence test"

does it include knowing about bible passages?

Why are you so scared of the Bible?




Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Because it's misinterpreted and used to oppress those who may not agree with the views of those who use it as a weapon.

What are you slobber babbling about.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - olliebaba - 05-05-2014 10:40 PM

Why are you so scared of the Bible?




Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
[/quote]

Because it's misinterpreted and used to oppress those who may not agree with the views of those who use it as a weapon.
[/quote]


03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao Good one.

Oh oh, now it's a weapon of mass destruction. Don't be afraid of it, it's your friend. 03-cloud9


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - mathenis89 - 05-05-2014 10:43 PM

Don't recall saying it's a weapon of mass destruction. Good to see your reading skills are up to par.

People use it, through misinterpretation, to judge other human beings and deny them equal rights. It's used to dispute advances in science and technology.

Those are bad things.

Edit: Also, you really need to learn how to quote properly.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - olliebaba - 05-05-2014 10:54 PM

Why quote the whole thing if I only want to stress the important stuff. When I wrote it I knew one of youse's would mention the weapon of mass destruction part. You guys really like to pick at minor stuff. But I think you still got my point.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - mathenis89 - 05-05-2014 10:54 PM

(05-05-2014 10:54 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Why quote the whole thing if I only want to stress the important stuff. When I wrote it I knew one of youse's would mention the weapon of mass destruction part. You guys really like to pick at minor stuff. But I think you still got my point.

You had no point.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - olliebaba - 05-05-2014 11:01 PM

You're right. Look in the mirror it's on top of your head.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - mathenis89 - 05-05-2014 11:02 PM

(05-05-2014 11:01 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  You're right. Look in the mirror it's on top of your head.

Well, I have to try and not cut myself on your razor sharp wit.


RE: The Anti Christians Take Another Supreme Court Hit - olliebaba - 05-05-2014 11:04 PM

Are you old enough to shave to have razors?