Alternative to RPI? - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: CUSAbbs (/forum-514.html) +---- Forum: CUSA Team Talk (/forum-432.html) +----- Forum: Western Kentucky (/forum-304.html) +----- Thread: Alternative to RPI? (/thread-15992.html) |
Alternative to RPI? - Hilltopper2K - 01-18-2007 07:44 PM I was just reading The Bracket Board and I was reminded of a thought I had back in the summer. Ezekiel (isn't he the one that does this?) points out that rpi doesn't measure how good a team is... only how a team does against its schedule and how well that teams opponenets do against thier schedules. I have thought that it would be nice to see a more objective ranking system (not based on polls) that does attempt to measure the quality of a team. I propose this formula: QUALITY SCORE = RPI x (REBOUNDS / OPPONENTS REBOUNDS) x (ASSIST TO TURNOVER RATIO) x (OPPONENTS TURNOVERS / OPPONENTS ASSISTS) So in other words quality = rpi x rebounding x offense x defense. Thoughts? Suggestions? - galojah - 01-20-2007 11:05 AM The RPI is what is, and we might as well embrace it and learn how to win with it. The MVC has done a great job with this. The SBC needs to learn. It's not about scheduling the top teams in the country. It is about scheduling teams you can win against. I am not a huge fan of the RPI either. |