(05-14-2017 09:51 PM)BeagleUSM Wrote: Thanks.
IMO, Texas has to sweep WVU to have a shot. No team has ever hosted with a losing or .500 record in conference (currently 9-11 in Big 12 play). Don't even think I had them on the bubble. WVU needs to take 2/3 to remain in the mix.
State probably has to beat LSU 2/3 to stay in the conversation. It's in Starkville so they may have a shot.
If USF takes 2/3 at UCF, they'll have a legit case because they'd probably have at least a share of the AAC title and a top 20 RPI/solid top 50 record. Houston has a solid T50/T100 record, but they need to get their RPI in the top 20 and they're not gonna get a huge boost playing Cincy at home. UCF is 5-9 vs top 50, which is not host material.
Think either Oklahoma or Baylor gets in. What was holding Baylor back was their Big 12 record but they are over .500 now and they have a good RPI and top 50/100 record.
The Beach's final series with Fullerton may determine whether or not they host.
Arkansas will host if they take 2/3 at TAMU, and might even if they don't.
Zona has a good RPI, but is 12-12 in PAC12 play and is 5-9 vs top 50. Remaining schedule won't give them much of a boost.
I was curious about previous years and how RPI lined up with the 16 hosts.
2016:
National seeds: 1-4 were exactly as the RPI went.
#5 Texas Tech was #14 in RPI (TT had a really good record against the Top 50 at 13-5)
#6 MSU was #11 in the RPI (I didn't understand that one.)
#7 Clemson was #6
#8 LSU was #7
Other hosts: FSU (13), NCSU (10), TCU (16), UVA (17), Ole Miss (5), ULL (15), Vandy (9), South Carolina (8)
So....last year, it was straight up the top 16 teams in the RPI selected to host with the exception of UVA (at 17) over Coastal (12). And with Coastal, you were looking at a team that was 7-8 against the Top 50 (UVA was 9-6) and just 13-11 against the Top 100 (UVA was 21-11).
2015:
#1 UCLA - #4 RPI
#2 LSU - #5
#3 Louisville - #12
#4 Florida - #3
#5 Miami - #1
#6 Illinois - #13
#7 TCU - #8
#8 Missouri State - #7
The other hosts: UCSB (20), Ok State (11), FSU (11), Dallas Baptist (#2), Houston (14), A&M (6), Fullerton (25), Vandy (10)
More of the same but two exceptions: UCSB and Fullerton. Those were easy to explain because the RPI was weird in 2015 and none of the teams ahead of them were legit contenders to host Ahead of them, we had Radford at 15, Coll. of Charleston at 16 (bad top 100), FAU (bad year for C-USA and bad Top 100 record), Bradley (.500 in conference), Auburn (was a #3 seed), USC (bad top 50/100), UVA (sub-.500 in conference, bad Top 100).
So....while the order may vary, you can usually go right down the RPI these last two years unless there's a serious black eye on someone's resume. For example:
-Pretty much everyone finishes well above .500 in conference (exception NCSU last year--16-15 but in the #1 conference and 20 wins over Top 50 teams and #10 in RPI). Arizona is an example of a team that would probably suffer because of conference record. Baylor presents a possible exception in they are in such a good conference and have 13 Top 50 wins and 22 Top 100.
-Poor Top 50/100 records: Missouri State. Another strike against Zona. So, I would be pretty confident neither of those two will host at this point.
If you look behind us, State, because of the Top 50 wins, definitely is one team that could jump us for a host spot. Arkansas, maybe. Oklahoma, maybe but more doubtful. Other than those three, I wouldn't be particularly concerned about anyone else if the season were over today. Maybe LBSU for geography but I don't think there will be a ton of West Coast teams in the tourney this year.
All in all, if we stay in the Top 16, I feel extremely good about our chances.