The unofficial online home for fans of the UAB Blazers. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(03-19-2017 05:45 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:59 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:38 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:27 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

What is it exactly that you want Dee ?

What?

I dont want nothing from you

I'm not talking about from me, what is it about this thread you can't turn loose ?

Its not me

(03-19-2017 07:16 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 05:45 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:59 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:38 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:27 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

What is it exactly that you want Dee ?

What?

I dont want nothing from you

I'm not talking about from me, what is it about this thread you can't turn loose ?

Its not me

RIIIIGHT

(03-19-2017 07:15 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 05:22 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  I never said Haase was a great coach. I said Davis wasn't.

I didnt say you did.

I never said Davis was great, but he did do some great things.

You were addressing me when you said this

"You can't tell me that Haase is a great coach..."

Who told you he was a great coach then?

(03-19-2017 07:17 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 07:16 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 05:45 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:59 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:38 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  What is it exactly that you want Dee ?

What?

I dont want nothing from you

I'm not talking about from me, what is it about this thread you can't turn loose ?

Its not me

RIIIIGHT

Swear

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

I see you do know gibberish, you deflect enough to wallow in it.

Explain the deflection, please.

Never seen a fan base so obsessed with a coach that did so little for a program. I guess Davis did have a huge impact after all.

I suppose we need something to talk about since we can't discuss our post season. Yet another example of our program's decline. Holy cow the negativity. Sorry about that. Maybe I'll get banned for not being a real fan.

(03-20-2017 08:26 AM)randy22263 Wrote:  Never seen a fan base so obsessed with a coach that did so little for a program. I guess Davis did have a huge impact after all.

I suppose we need something to talk about since we can't discuss our post season. Yet another example of our program's decline. Holy cow the negativity. Sorry about that. Maybe I'll get banned for not being a real fan.

Tell me about it.

(03-19-2017 07:18 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 07:15 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 05:22 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  I never said Haase was a great coach. I said Davis wasn't.

I didnt say you did.

I never said Davis was great, but he did do some great things.

You were addressing me when you said this

"You can't tell me that Haase is a great coach..."

Who told you he was a great coach then?

I'm still waiting on an answer to this question too? I've yet to see the post where somebody said Haase was a great coach.

(03-21-2017 09:00 AM)blazers9911 Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 07:18 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 07:15 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 05:22 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  I never said Haase was a great coach. I said Davis wasn't.

I didnt say you did.

I never said Davis was great, but he did do some great things.

You were addressing me when you said this

"You can't tell me that Haase is a great coach..."

Who told you he was a great coach then?

I'm still waiting on an answer to this question too? I've yet to see the post where somebody said Haase was a great coach.

Lol

Smh

Damn guys....................really?

WTH does it matter? AT least argue about something else.

Can you provide a list of acceptable topics to argue about.

It's been civil and hasn't violated any board rules.

I don't think you guys need any help finding things to argue about. I'm not saying you cant argue. I'm just saying its about ridiculous and I'm sure most normal people get tired of reading it.

No requirement to read it. I agree it is ridiculous though.

I've enjoyed it, haha.. Dee really digs in like Donald Trump. He definitely doesn't change what he says or believes no matter the evidence against him (not calling you out Dee - I do agree with some of what you say)

(03-21-2017 01:05 PM)The Answer UAB Wrote:  I've enjoyed it, haha.. Dee really digs in like Donald Trump. He definitely doesn't change what he says or believes no matter the evidence against him (not calling you out Dee - I do agree with some of what you say)

Lmao no offense taken.

(03-21-2017 10:48 AM)ATTALLABLAZE Wrote:  I don't think you guys need any help finding things to argue about. I'm not saying you cant argue. I'm just saying its about ridiculous and I'm sure most normal people get tired of reading it.

If somebody got tired of it, they should've quit reading days ago. How normal is somebody who clicks this thread and looks for something new?

You would be surprised. :-)

It's like most reality shows I watch at times, I know it's ratchet, but I can't help but stop and look as I channel surf.

When you see a train wreck you are compelled to look at it.