The unofficial online home for fans of the UAB Blazers. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

Somebody please euthanize this thread Dee can't turn loose.

(03-19-2017 11:01 AM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  Somebody please euthanize this thread Dee can't turn loose.

Lol

Nope not i Davis is the better coach. Haase only won two more conference tourney games in a vastly weaker conference and had a huge one point win which was a program changer. Lol

Davis was a good coach, I always felt UAB had a chance to win with the offense and defense he played.
I also believe Hasse appeara to be getting a pass when it comes to his exit plan from UAB.
UAB playing WKU in the first round of CUSA play and Hasse is in negotiation to become Stanford$s coach.
Davis vilified Hasse glorified one for rumors the other for actual coaching UAB and talking to Standford. UAN was nor ready. Lose we go to the NIT Hasse to Standfors. double standards...

(03-19-2017 11:01 AM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  Somebody please euthanize this thread Dee can't turn loose.

if people would quit feeding him (which i have been guilty of), these painful threads (or at least the painful portions of them) would die

(03-19-2017 01:58 PM)Rebounder2u Wrote:  Davis was a good coach, I always felt UAB had a chance to win with the offense and defense he played.
I also believe Hasse appeara to be getting a pass when it comes to his exit plan from UAB.
UAB playing WKU in the first round of CUSA play and Hasse is in negotiation to become Stanford$s coach.
Davis vilified Hasse glorified one for rumors the other for actual coaching UAB and talking to Standford. UAN was nor ready. Lose we go to the NIT Hasse to Standfors. double standards...

Every coach we've had listen to and negotiated with other programs, with the possible exceptions of Murry and Ehsan.

(03-19-2017 02:05 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 01:58 PM)Rebounder2u Wrote:  Davis was a good coach, I always felt UAB had a chance to win with the offense and defense he played.
I also believe Hasse appeara to be getting a pass when it comes to his exit plan from UAB.
UAB playing WKU in the first round of CUSA play and Hasse is in negotiation to become Stanford$s coach.
Davis vilified Hasse glorified one for rumors the other for actual coaching UAB and talking to Standford. UAN was nor ready. Lose we go to the NIT Hasse to Standfors. double standards...

Every coach we've had listen to and negotiated with other programs, with the possible exceptions of Murry and Ehsan.

Such is the life of a "successful" mid-major coach. But, while most coaches are reactive in that regard, Davis was proactive...

(03-19-2017 01:58 PM)Rebounder2u Wrote:  Davis was a good coach, I always felt UAB had a chance to win with the offense and defense he played.
I also believe Hasse appeara to be getting a pass when it comes to his exit plan from UAB.
UAB playing WKU in the first round of CUSA play and Hasse is in negotiation to become Stanford$s coach.
Davis vilified Hasse glorified one for rumors the other for actual coaching UAB and talking to Standford. UAN was nor ready. Lose we go to the NIT Hasse to Standfors. double standards...

Huge +1

Even got daddy to call.

(03-19-2017 02:03 PM)LairDweller Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 11:01 AM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  Somebody please euthanize this thread Dee can't turn loose.

if people would quit feeding him (which i have been guilty of), these painful threads (or at least the painful portions of them) would die

Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

(03-19-2017 02:17 PM)WesternBlazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:05 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 01:58 PM)Rebounder2u Wrote:  Davis was a good coach, I always felt UAB had a chance to win with the offense and defense he played.
I also believe Hasse appeara to be getting a pass when it comes to his exit plan from UAB.
UAB playing WKU in the first round of CUSA play and Hasse is in negotiation to become Stanford$s coach.
Davis vilified Hasse glorified one for rumors the other for actual coaching UAB and talking to Standford. UAN was nor ready. Lose we go to the NIT Hasse to Standfors. double standards...

Every coach we've had listen to and negotiated with other programs, with the possible exceptions of Murry and Ehsan.

Such is the life of a "successful" mid-major coach. But, while most coaches are reactive in that regard, Davis was proactive...

And Haase wasnt right?


Or did he realize the situations of the athletic department and just take off. Now i dont fault him for leaving every since that interview i saw with him and Watts i believe. I loved his honesty and his vision he had of UAB.

Haase never even put together a strong season here.

(03-19-2017 01:58 PM)Rebounder2u Wrote:  Davis was a good coach, I always felt UAB had a chance to win with the offense and defense he played.
I also believe Hasse appeara to be getting a pass when it comes to his exit plan from UAB.
UAB playing WKU in the first round of CUSA play and Hasse is in negotiation to become Stanford$s coach.
Davis vilified Hasse glorified one for rumors the other for actual coaching UAB and talking to Standford. UAN was nor ready. Lose we go to the NIT Hasse to Standfors. double standards...

You don't seem to know how coaching searches go. Haase was not in negotiations with Stanford while the CUSA tournament was going on. His agent may have been, but he wasn't . I can't really comment on the rest of tour post, because it appears to be gibberish.

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

(03-19-2017 04:27 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

What is it exactly that you want Dee ?

(03-19-2017 04:27 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

I added Gene just to include everyone.

You were the one who said Haase only won two more games than Davis. I was just pointing out that the number of games won isn't as important as the winning percentage.

Davis won 122 games. Haase won 80. Again, you are talking about 6 years verses 4. Win percentages is

Haase .602
Davis .598

Now I know your next argument is going to be strength of schedule.

Davis's CUSA was not that much tougher than Haase's CUSA. Remove Memphis, and they are about a wash.

Haas's last non conference schedule was weak, but the other three were pretty strong. Davis feasted his whole career on home cupcakes.

(03-19-2017 04:38 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:27 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

What is it exactly that you want Dee ?

What?

I dont want nothing from you

(03-19-2017 04:39 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:27 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

I added Gene just to include everyone.

You were the one who said Haase only won two more games than Davis. I was just pointing out that the number of games won isn't as important as the winning percentage.

Whos percentage is better?

Davis won 122 games. Haase won 80. Again, you are talking about 6 years verses 4. Win percentages is

Haase .602
Davis .598


Nope more like Davis .621 and Haase .602




Now I know your next argument is going to be strength of schedule.

Davis's CUSA was not that much tougher than Haase's CUSA. Remove Memphis, and they are about a wash.

Haas's last non conference schedule was weak, but the other three were pretty strong. Davis feasted his whole career on home cupcakes.

What was 2015-2016????? Whats their records against P6s, top 5s,10s, 25s,50s and 100s.



You cant tell me Haase is a great coach and at a certain point in his third season he was 16-15 and then a miracle.

Three straight wins in Legacy, one NCAA tournament win over a three seed, lost by the same margin as Davis to UCLA, schedules cupcakes win 26 of them and a regular season title, lose first round in Legacy the following season, and then losses first round nit.


Which was most important his career to that point or calls from daddy. Also if daddy calls in to both jobs for Haase, how you know Williams aint field offers for Haase to safely land from UaB.[/b]

I never said Haase was a great coach. I said Davis wasn't.

(03-19-2017 04:59 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:38 PM)BlazerPhil Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 04:27 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.

What is it exactly that you want Dee ?

What?

I dont want nothing from you

I'm not talking about from me, what is it about this thread you can't turn loose ?

(03-19-2017 05:22 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  I never said Haase was a great coach. I said Davis wasn't.

I didnt say you did.

I never said Davis was great, but he did do some great things.