During the meeting on Tuesday, Trump was asked by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) if he would support "a clean DACA bill."
"Yeah, I would like to do it," Trump said during the meeting, according to The Washington Post.
Wow I didn't see that coming.
He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
(01-10-2018 10:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
XACLY!
And many a con ain't none to pleased about it!
Quote:Conservative immigration hawks are losing faith in President trump, who left them fuming Tuesday when he endorsed a two-phase process to permanently protect young undocumented immigrants and later pursue comprehensive changes to interior enforcement and legal immigration policies.
Immigration hawks fear two-phase DACA deal could lead to trump amnesty
Just more amateur hour from the child-in-chief.
(01-10-2018 10:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]And many a con ain't none to pleased about it!
Quote:Conservative immigration hawks are losing faith in President trump, who left them fuming Tuesday when he endorsed a two-phase process to permanently protect young undocumented immigrants and later pursue comprehensive changes to interior enforcement and legal immigration policies.
Immigration hawks fear two-phase DACA deal could lead to Trump amnesty
Just more amateur hour from the child-in-chief.
Well, if there are those on BOTH sides pissed then, to me, that means it's going in the right direction.
(01-10-2018 10:48 AM)VA49er Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]And many a con ain't none to pleased about it!
Quote:Conservative immigration hawks are losing faith in President trump, who left them fuming Tuesday when he endorsed a two-phase process to permanently protect young undocumented immigrants and later pursue comprehensive changes to interior enforcement and legal immigration policies.
Immigration hawks fear two-phase DACA deal could lead to Trump amnesty
Just more amateur hour from the child-in-chief.
Well, if there are those on BOTH sides pissed then, to me, that means it's going in the right direction.
and he put 'em all in front of the camera for the rest of the country to see....
don't kid yourself.....this one won't be the last one....
#unprecedented
#theswamp
Remember when libturds celebrated, and republican leadership were panic-strickened when Trump went around the republicans to get Hurricane relief aid last summer. The libturds thought Trump's bargaining chip was gone, and during year end the libturds could hold up whatever they wanted, like tax reform and the spending bill, and get whatever they wanted.
lulz
(01-10-2018 10:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:48 AM)VA49er Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]And many a con ain't none to pleased about it!
Quote:Conservative immigration hawks are losing faith in President trump, who left them fuming Tuesday when he endorsed a two-phase process to permanently protect young undocumented immigrants and later pursue comprehensive changes to interior enforcement and legal immigration policies.
Immigration hawks fear two-phase DACA deal could lead to Trump amnesty
Just more amateur hour from the child-in-chief.
Well, if there are those on BOTH sides pissed then, to me, that means it's going in the right direction.
and he put 'em all in front of the camera for the rest of the country to see....
don't kid yourself.....this one won't be the last one....
#unprecedented
#theswamp
Yeah...keep thinking that was his plan all along.
Stable genius.
(01-10-2018 10:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:48 AM)VA49er Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]And many a con ain't none to pleased about it!
Quote:Conservative immigration hawks are losing faith in President trump, who left them fuming Tuesday when he endorsed a two-phase process to permanently protect young undocumented immigrants and later pursue comprehensive changes to interior enforcement and legal immigration policies.
Immigration hawks fear two-phase DACA deal could lead to Trump amnesty
Just more amateur hour from the child-in-chief.
Well, if there are those on BOTH sides pissed then, to me, that means it's going in the right direction.
and he put 'em all in front of the camera for the rest of the country to see....
don't kid yourself.....this one won't be the last one....
#unprecedented
#theswamp
Yeah...keep thinking that was his plan all along.
Stable genius.
there's no doubt in my mind......he wanted to show the world who was mentally stable and who wasn't.....
there was never a question you would whiff that 345732948528934789D chess move.....
#stockingtheshelves
#buildinganarmy
(01-10-2018 10:48 AM)VA49er Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]And many a con ain't none to pleased about it!
Quote:Conservative immigration hawks are losing faith in President trump, who left them fuming Tuesday when he endorsed a two-phase process to permanently protect young undocumented immigrants and later pursue comprehensive changes to interior enforcement and legal immigration policies.
Immigration hawks fear two-phase DACA deal could lead to Trump amnesty
Just more amateur hour from the child-in-chief.
Well, if there are those on BOTH sides pissed then, to me, that means it's going in the right direction.
Pretty much where I fall... I hope trump does not beleve the dems when they say "let's do DACA and then come back for comprehensive"... They lied in the 80's, and they are lying now.
(01-10-2018 10:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
I'm not against increased border security but a wall? Seriously?
Why would we want to spend billions on a wall when we could spend billions on more border patrol agents.
Wouldn't that make more sense?
(01-10-2018 11:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
I'm not against increased border security but a wall? Seriously?
Why would we want to spend billions on a wall when we could spend billions on more border patrol agents.
Wouldn't that make more sense?
How about both, with some high tech stuff thrown in.
(01-10-2018 11:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
I'm not against increased border security but a wall? Seriously?
Why would we want to spend billions on a wall when we could spend billions on more border patrol agents.
Wouldn't that make more sense?
NO!
why continually pay to put more in harm's way if it can be controlled with an inanimate object, technology and a limited labor force???
your method would only yield more fail and calls of racism (which you so adore)....
(01-10-2018 10:36 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]During the meeting on Tuesday, Trump was asked by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) if he would support "a clean DACA bill."
"Yeah, I would like to do it," Trump said during the meeting, according to The Washington Post.
Wow I didn't see that coming.
And I'd be surprised if it did happen. Trump wants to use children as a way to extort Dems and moderates on his stupid wall.
(01-10-2018 11:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 11:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
I'm not against increased border security but a wall? Seriously?
Why would we want to spend billions on a wall when we could spend billions on more border patrol agents.
Wouldn't that make more sense?
How about both, with some high tech stuff thrown in.
Because a wall is a big waste of money. If you build a wall with no additional security, the "illegals" will simply build a ladder that's one foot higher.
We can accomplish the same thing by simply hiring more agents.
(01-10-2018 12:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 11:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 11:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
I'm not against increased border security but a wall? Seriously?
Why would we want to spend billions on a wall when we could spend billions on more border patrol agents.
Wouldn't that make more sense?
How about both, with some high tech stuff thrown in.
Because a wall is a big waste of money. If you build a wall with no additional security, the "illegals" will simply build a ladder that's one foot higher.
We can accomplish the same thing by simply hiring more agents.
So you are admitting that Obama was completely incompetent?
(01-10-2018 12:04 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 12:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 11:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 11:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:40 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]He supports a clean daca bill, as long as:
1. Border security is done first.
2. His other items are done first.
In other words, if you get his items done, then the daca bill can and will be clean.
What they ended up agreeing to moving forward is that daca, border security, and chain migration will be addressed in phase I.
I'm not against increased border security but a wall? Seriously?
Why would we want to spend billions on a wall when we could spend billions on more border patrol agents.
Wouldn't that make more sense?
How about both, with some high tech stuff thrown in.
Because a wall is a big waste of money. If you build a wall with no additional security, the "illegals" will simply build a ladder that's one foot higher.
We can accomplish the same thing by simply hiring more agents.
So you are admitting that Obama was completely incompetent?
I thought I would try having a serious conversation with you.
I guess that's not happening.
(01-10-2018 10:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:48 AM)VA49er Wrote: [ -> ] (01-10-2018 10:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]And many a con ain't none to pleased about it!
Quote:Conservative immigration hawks are losing faith in President trump, who left them fuming Tuesday when he endorsed a two-phase process to permanently protect young undocumented immigrants and later pursue comprehensive changes to interior enforcement and legal immigration policies.
Immigration hawks fear two-phase DACA deal could lead to Trump amnesty
Just more amateur hour from the child-in-chief.
Well, if there are those on BOTH sides pissed then, to me, that means it's going in the right direction.
and he put 'em all in front of the camera for the rest of the country to see....
don't kid yourself.....this one won't be the last one....
#unprecedented
#theswamp
Yeah...keep thinking that was his plan all along.
Stable genius.
He could be a total fricking idiot and he is still 50 iq points smarter than that clown Obama. He's undoing almost a decade of that imbecile trying to destroy the United States. It becomes more obvious everyday.
(01-10-2018 12:13 PM)Claw Wrote: [ -> ]Wall first.
Sent from my LG-LS997 using CSNbbs mobile app
this and all of this. he said that the democrats wont get **** if they dont agree to fund his wall.