CSNbbs

We've already lost to N. Texas, and are anticipating a loss to UTSA, both of whom are in our division. That means championship game is not in the cards regardless if what we do the next two weeks. Other than that, I think it is spot on. These next two weeks are make or break.

(10-05-2017 09:54 AM)BatesUAB Wrote: [ -> ]We've already lost to N. Texas, and are anticipating a loss to UTSA, both of whom are in our division. That means championship game is not in the cards regardless if what we do the next two weeks. Other than that, I think it is spot on. These next two weeks are make or break.

The winner of our division will have 3 conference losses.

(10-05-2017 09:54 AM)BatesUAB Wrote: [ -> ]We've already lost to N. Texas, and are anticipating a loss to UTSA, both of whom are in our division. That means championship game is not in the cards regardless if what we do the next two weeks. Other than that, I think it is spot on. These next two weeks are make or break.

(10-05-2017 11:08 AM)cb4029 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-05-2017 09:54 AM)BatesUAB Wrote: [ -> ]We've already lost to N. Texas, and are anticipating a loss to UTSA, both of whom are in our division. That means championship game is not in the cards regardless if what we do the next two weeks. Other than that, I think it is spot on. These next two weeks are make or break.

Which part of what I said is wrong? We have lost to N. Texas. The article that was posted does anticipate a loss to UTSA. Those teams are in our division. You look at the schedule of those two teams and tell me where there are 3 conference losses for either of them. I don't think you will find them. And if we indeed lose to UTSA, as the article suggests, we will have a minimum of 2 conference losses, which means that for us to get to the championship game we would have to win every other conference game we played and N. Texas and UTSA would have to lose 3 apiece since they both would have a tiebreaker over us (head to head wins.)