CSNbbs

See the poll.

1 or 3 would be excellent. In fact hadn't even thought of 3. Seems like the best compromise imo. Anything but 2. Thanks GTS.

I personally chose 3 the "team option," though I know that will probably create a bunch of pinned threads near the top of the board.

(08-22-2017 08:22 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote: [ -> ]See the poll.

GTS, Funny...with your post and the MST 3K sig, it looks Joel is pointing at the post.

As I have said, if we want to maintain a single thread to keep a tally of new commitments then fine. However, like pages within one single thread, separate threads are also in infinite supply as well and relatively harmless when discussing the specifics of various signees, commitments, and prospects. So I support #2 or #3. However, if we must limit threads, then each school can maintain their own recruiting thread. But it will be interesting to see who will be the ones supplying the recruiting information for the schools who lack representation here.

I would go with 3. Option 1 seems like way to much work.

For the record I voted 1 but if I could I would change to 3 now.

(08-22-2017 11:00 PM)NMSUPistolPete Wrote: [ -> ]As I have said, if we want to maintain a single thread to keep a tally of new commitments then fine. However, like pages within one single thread, separate threads are also in infinite supply as well and relatively harmless when discussing the specifics of various signees, commitments, and prospects. So I support #2 or #3. However, if we must limit threads, then each school can maintain their own recruiting thread. But it will be interesting to see who will be the ones supplying the recruiting information for the schools who lack representation here.

The old Scout board had a few UVU guys who regularly posted. Then they suddenly vanished. "Wisp..." is around here though I think.

Currently mobile....away from the house or on the 'throne.'

(08-22-2017 11:00 PM)NMSUPistolPete Wrote: [ -> ]As I have said, if we want to maintain a single thread to keep a tally of new commitments then fine. However, like pages within one single thread, separate threads are also in infinite supply as well and relatively harmless when discussing the specifics of various signees, commitments, and prospects. So I support #2 or #3. However, if we must limit threads, then each school can maintain their own recruiting thread. But it will be interesting to see who will be the ones supplying the recruiting information for the schools who lack representation here.

During recruiting season I regularly updated notable offers for all teams. I have no problem continuing to do that if needed.

(08-23-2017 12:32 AM)Clarity Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-22-2017 11:00 PM)NMSUPistolPete Wrote: [ -> ]As I have said, if we want to maintain a single thread to keep a tally of new commitments then fine. However, like pages within one single thread, separate threads are also in infinite supply as well and relatively harmless when discussing the specifics of various signees, commitments, and prospects. So I support #2 or #3. However, if we must limit threads, then each school can maintain their own recruiting thread. But it will be interesting to see who will be the ones supplying the recruiting information for the schools who lack representation here.

During recruiting season I regularly updated notable offers for all teams. I have no problem continuing to do that if needed.

I post recruits/commits for all WAC teams as well. I am just pointing out that some of these school specific "recruiting" thread will not be regularly manned by a poster from the school of interest.

I don't find a problem with that personally.

We're going to try out #3.