CSNbbs

Full Version: ABC News' Libelous Fake News; Labels Prominent Religious Liberty Org as "Hate Group"
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Apparently a group that has won 7 SCOTUS decisions in the last 7 years is now a "hate group" because the SPLC says so. This is precisely why Trump won, and why the people despise the media.

Shame on you, ABC.

[Image: ABCnewsscreenshot.jpg]

Quote:A prominent Christian legal group is demanding ABC News retract a story that labeled them a “hate group,” calling the article “journalistic malpractice.”

The Alliance Defending Freedom, a non-profit legal organization that specializes in First Amendment cases, is a respected legal organization that recently represented Trinity Lutheran Church before the Supreme Court — winning a 7-2 victory just last month.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/13/media-...ium=Social
you got burned twice in the last week posting headlines that were factually disproven. One FNC didn't even touch because it was so fundamentally wrong and the other FNC did report on only to come out with a retraction. and yet you have the audacity to claim those stories were correct because you had "three reputable sources" claiming otherwise and dismissed what CNN was reporting as a literal conspiracy theory.

and yet you call these MSM media sources "fake news" while propping up your clearly unreliable partisan news sources as legitimate. That is precisely why Trump won. Because an alarming segment of the population highlighted by the OP can not comprehend basic news literacy and basic level of critical thought in regards to their news sources.

the entire right-wing media pushed a false story that was disproven by a basic google search. there was never any evidence to support it, but they were dealing with a story detrimental to the conservative cause so something needed to be done to give conservatives the moral high ground on said story. so a completely BS story was presented as factual and believed by conservatives simply because the conservatives needed it to be true.
johnnyzero, you are so utterly clueless and hypocritical that you don't even realize how much this also applies to you and others on the left with the "17 intelligence agencies" lie and other baseless Manchurian candidate conspiracy theories. Instead of admitting you were wrong, you tried to spin it as "4/17 is the same as 17/17" and never even addressed that the spokesmen and spokeswomen of those agencies were proven liars who produced zero evidence to support their claims, even though you continue to criticize conservative's sources on here for prior lies or distortions.

(07-14-2017 07:29 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]the entire left-wing media pushed a false story that was disproven by a basic google search. there was never any evidence to support it, but they were dealing with a story detrimental to the liberal cause so something needed to be done to give liberals the moral high ground on said story. so a completely BS story was presented as factual and believed by conservatives simply because the liberals needed it to be true.

59% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote totals

http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cum...Report.pdf
(07-14-2017 11:10 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]johnnyzero, you are so utterly clueless and hypocritical that you don't even realize how much this also applies to you and others on the left with the "17 intelligence agencies" lie and other baseless Manchurian candidate conspiracy theories. Instead of admitting you were wrong, you tried to spin it as "4/17 is the same as 17/17" and never even addressed that the spokesmen and spokeswomen of those agencies were proven liars who produced zero evidence to support their claims, even though you continue to criticize conservative's sources on here for prior lies or distortions.

(07-14-2017 07:29 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]the entire left-wing media pushed a false story that was disproven by a basic google search. there was never any evidence to support it, but they were dealing with a story detrimental to the liberal cause so something needed to be done to give liberals the moral high ground on said story. so a completely BS story was presented as factual and believed by conservatives simply because the liberals needed it to be true.

59% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote totals

http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cum...Report.pdf

30% are mentally deficient. 29% are just butthurt
(07-14-2017 11:10 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]johnnyzero, you are so utterly clueless and hypocritical that you don't even realize how much this also applies to you and others on the left with the "17 intelligence agencies" lie and other baseless Manchurian candidate conspiracy theories. Instead of admitting you were wrong, you tried to spin it as "4/17 is the same as 17/17" and never even addressed that the spokesmen and spokeswomen of those agencies were proven liars who produced zero evidence to support their claims, even though you continue to criticize conservative's sources on here for prior lies or distortions.

(07-14-2017 07:29 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]the entire left-wing media pushed a false story that was disproven by a basic google search. there was never any evidence to support it, but they were dealing with a story detrimental to the liberal cause so something needed to be done to give liberals the moral high ground on said story. so a completely BS story was presented as factual and believed by conservatives simply because the liberals needed it to be true.

59% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote totals

http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cum...Report.pdf

what are you talking about? who are the dems that have advocated the notion that Russia directly hacked the election vote results? in the months after the election that was never stated by a notable dem nor did a major media source ever make that claim. the only time such a notion was ever brought up in the MSM was when REPUBLICANS said it. They figured they could discredit the libs if they (falsely) accused the libs of claiming it was about hacking vote totals because that is a ridiculous notion that is clearly false.

it wasn't even until June that anything even closely resembling the possibility of impacting votes directly was brought up in the russian scandal. and that was over reports of russia might have tried to hack/remove voters from the voter rolls. but that postdates all the time from after the election to last month when this story was covered on an almost daily basis and your own poll.

speaking of which your poll is pretty crap. The only places it has been published are reddit, twitter, some no-name websites, and dailycaller. not fox news let alone abc, cbs, etc. why? because it's not newsworthy at all nor is it being taken seriously.

I guess you fell for the republicans BS hook, line, and sinker.
How long is the liberal butthurt going to last?
(07-15-2017 12:30 AM)450bench Wrote: [ -> ]How long is the liberal butthurt going to last?

Can you imagine after Trump gets re-elected?
(07-15-2017 12:30 AM)450bench Wrote: [ -> ]How long is the liberal butthurt going to last?

(07-15-2017 12:21 AM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-14-2017 11:10 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote: [ -> ]johnnyzero, you are so utterly clueless and hypocritical that you don't even realize how much this also applies to you and others on the left with the "17 intelligence agencies" lie and other baseless Manchurian candidate conspiracy theories. Instead of admitting you were wrong, you tried to spin it as "4/17 is the same as 17/17" and never even addressed that the spokesmen and spokeswomen of those agencies were proven liars who produced zero evidence to support their claims, even though you continue to criticize conservative's sources on here for prior lies or distortions.

(07-14-2017 07:29 PM)john01992 Wrote: [ -> ]the entire left-wing media pushed a false story that was disproven by a basic google search. there was never any evidence to support it, but they were dealing with a story detrimental to the liberal cause so something needed to be done to give liberals the moral high ground on said story. so a completely BS story was presented as factual and believed by conservatives simply because the liberals needed it to be true.

59% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote totals

http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cum...Report.pdf

what are you talking about? who are the dems that have advocated the notion that Russia directly hacked the election vote results? in the months after the election that was never stated by a notable dem nor did a major media source ever make that claim. the only time such a notion was ever brought up in the MSM was when REPUBLICANS said it. They figured they could discredit the libs if they (falsely) accused the libs of claiming it was about hacking vote totals because that is a ridiculous notion that is clearly false.

it wasn't even until June that anything even closely resembling the possibility of impacting votes directly was brought up in the russian scandal. and that was over reports of russia might have tried to hack/remove voters from the voter rolls. but that postdates all the time from after the election to last month when this story was covered on an almost daily basis and your own poll.

speaking of which your poll is pretty crap. The only places it has been published are reddit, twitter, some no-name websites, and dailycaller. not fox news let alone abc, cbs, etc. why? because it's not newsworthy at all nor is it being taken seriously.

I guess you fell for the republicans BS hook, line, and sinker.

^^Another great example. You don't like the poll results because it makes Dems look like idiots, so it's crap. I guess The Economist and YouGov are part of the giant Russian conspiracy in your mind. So you think the mainstream outlets would focus on a poll that highlights how their ridiculous coverage has caused people to believe something that isn't real? Just Google "Russia election hacking" and see the results. Time, NYT, and CNN were the first three media outlets that showed up, using "election hacking" or a similar phrase. The NYT even has an entire section dedicated to it. I'm sure you'll just try to discredit the source like you always do, but here is a good article on media manipulation.

https://extranewsfeed.com/poll-mass-medi...cd0e7e9d17
(07-15-2017 12:30 AM)450bench Wrote: [ -> ]How long is the liberal butthurt going to last?

Just 15 years and 6 months to go.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reference URL's