CSNbbs

Pretty cool actually

Memphis is going to be playing ranked teams upcoming and if beat them, playoffs here we come.

(02-12-2017 06:02 PM)MemphisTigers2009 Wrote: [ -> ]Memphis is going to be playing ranked teams upcoming and if beat them, playoffs here we come.

You are quite optimistic and positive.

WGAS. NTR.

Yeah it's not Tiger related, oh wait, except for the damn fact that both SMU and Cincinnati are in the same damn conference we play in, which clearly makes it not Tiger related.

WADA

NTR

(02-13-2017 01:28 AM)AlonsoWDC Wrote: [ -> ]NTR

I must have missed SMU's and Cincinnati's departure from the AAC.

(02-13-2017 01:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 01:28 AM)AlonsoWDC Wrote: [ -> ]NTR

I must have missed SMU's and Cincinnati's departure from the AAC.

We had the table set for us so that we could make some headway if we beat one or both of SMU and Cincinnati. That loss to Temple hurt us.

Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

(02-13-2017 01:13 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah it's not Tiger related, oh wait, except for the damn fact that both SMU and Cincinnati are in the same damn conference we play in, which clearly makes it not Tiger related.

WADA

Both of those teams can play. We'll be doing well to get one win. As for this thread, I guess it's "No Poster Left Behind".

(02-13-2017 08:13 AM)jamgut Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

(02-13-2017 08:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:13 AM)jamgut Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:13 AM)jamgut Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

All bias aside this was good for the conference. The AAC was looking at the possibility of having only one school in the tourney and us pulling out the win helps assure the AAC of having two. Good game, too.

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:13 AM)jamgut Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:13 AM)jamgut Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

Right.

No one is saying Memphis should beat Kentucky.

They are saying, if SMU and Cincinnati don't 'suffer' from fatigue, then neither should Memphis.

Either way - these cats need some serious time on the weights and in the gym over this summer.

We haven't had a S&C coach earn his money since Calipari.

(02-14-2017 09:18 AM)innman Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:13 AM)jamgut Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Innman = Dumb Azz Can't make an informative post to save his life.

(02-14-2017 09:18 AM)innman Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:13 AM)jamgut Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting that the 5 SMU players with the most minutes played account for 80% of the team's total, while our top 5 account for 78%. Fatigued starters doesn't seem to impacting the Mustangs nearly as much as us.

Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, even you, who struggles mightily for common sense. Keep posting though, heck you may stumble on something halfway right.

(02-14-2017 11:05 AM)Penny Lane Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-14-2017 09:18 AM)innman Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 08:41 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]Did it occur to you that their starting five is better than ours??

How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Innman = Dumb Azz Can't make an informative post to save his life.

I see you are still a douchebag who insults posters.

(02-14-2017 12:47 PM)VinnieVegas Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-14-2017 11:05 AM)Penny Lane Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-14-2017 09:18 AM)innman Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:21 AM)TubbyTime Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-13-2017 10:03 AM)salukiblue Wrote: [ -> ]How does that translate to fatigue?

SMU literally played six guys yesterday. Minute totals of 39, 38, 35, 33, 28, and 27.

Heck, Cinci's starting five went: 38, 38, 36, 33, and 33.

I still stand by the fact their players are better, stronger, and have more experience.

TubbyTime = Penny Lane when it comes to objectivity or lack thereof.

Innman = Dumb Azz Can't make an informative post to save his life.

I see you are still a douchebag who insults posters.

No dog in the fight, but irony much?