CSNbbs

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketba...hoarlships

Huge hit to Syracuse.

& I will not cry a river.

"The university, however, must reimburse the NCAA for all revenue earned during the NCAA tournaments from 2011-13."

Ouch! There was at least one final four trip in there.

"took away 12 scholarships"

So they'll have one scholarship player?

(03-06-2015 01:26 PM)58-56 Wrote: [ -> ]"took away 12 scholarships"

So they'll have one scholarship player?

3 each year I believe

(03-06-2015 01:08 PM)uabfanman Wrote: [ -> ]"The university, however, must reimburse the NCAA for all revenue earned during the NCAA tournaments from 2011-13."

Ouch! There was at least one final four trip in there.

A round of 32, an elite 8, and a final four.

Well this just proves the NCAA is nothing but inconsistent. UNC and Miami basically had nothing done to them. Syracuse gets pounded. Just make rules and make punishments for them.

(03-06-2015 01:59 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-06-2015 01:08 PM)uabfanman Wrote: [ -> ]"The university, however, must reimburse the NCAA for all revenue earned during the NCAA tournaments from 2011-13."

Ouch! There was at least one final four trip in there.

A round of 32, an elite 8, and a final four.

Actually, on second thought, isn't the money earned shared among conference members? So, will the other teams have to pay back the money Syracuse earned them?

(03-06-2015 04:59 PM)uabfanman Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-06-2015 01:59 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-06-2015 01:08 PM)uabfanman Wrote: [ -> ]"The university, however, must reimburse the NCAA for all revenue earned during the NCAA tournaments from 2011-13."

Ouch! There was at least one final four trip in there.

A round of 32, an elite 8, and a final four.

Actually, on second thought, isn't the money earned shared among conference members? So, will the other teams have to pay back the money Syracuse earned them?

Football bowl games pay out to the participating conferences who then split total bowl proceeds among member schools (that's why the conferences want to sign up for as many bowls as they can). The NCAA Tournament basketball pay outs are to the participating schools based upon number of games played and MAY not be split within the conference (conference rules may vary). That is probably why the NCAA can make such a demand for repayment in basketball but not in football.

(03-06-2015 10:46 PM)BAMANBLAZERFAN Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-06-2015 04:59 PM)uabfanman Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-06-2015 01:59 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-06-2015 01:08 PM)uabfanman Wrote: [ -> ]"The university, however, must reimburse the NCAA for all revenue earned during the NCAA tournaments from 2011-13."

Ouch! There was at least one final four trip in there.

A round of 32, an elite 8, and a final four.

Actually, on second thought, isn't the money earned shared among conference members? So, will the other teams have to pay back the money Syracuse earned them?

Football bowl games pay out to the participating conferences who then split total bowl proceeds among member schools (that's why the conferences want to sign up for as many bowls as they can). The NCAA Tournament basketball pay outs are to the participating schools based upon number of games played and MAY not be split within the conference (conference rules may vary). That is probably why the NCAA can make such a demand for repayment in basketball but not in football.

Yet again, speaking on a subject you have no clue about. If you don't know the answer to something, the least upon could do is look it up. I would question you having access to the Internet, but you are on this site.

Syracuse was hit so hard because of the lack of institutional control aspect. Not sure what their proof of this was, but it can be hard to prove these issues were known at an institutional level and covered up. I think this is why you don't see penalties as harsh as this in many other circumstances.

I'm sure many of the powerhouse programs in football and basketball have rules violation issues at the institutional level, but again, discovering supporting evidence is probably the biggest challenge. In this case, I guess they had sufficient evidence to pursue the lack of institutional control charge.

Did you read about Miami and UNC though? If those weren't also cases of lack of institutional control, I don't know what is.

They would have hit Miami just as hard, but the NCAA screwed the investigation up.

(03-07-2015 09:01 AM)blazers9911 Wrote: [ -> ]Did you read about Miami and UNC though? If those weren't also cases of lack of institutional control, I don't know what is.

Miami was a total cluster...but UNC isn't out of the woods, yet.

The Miami case exposed a lack of institutional control in the NCAA themselves.