CSNbbs

Full Version: Stats-Good/Bad thru 10/11/14
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Stats National Ranking(MAC):
Total Offense 16(1)
Rush Offense 20(1)
Eush Defense 23(1)
3rd Down Conversion% 19(2)
Sacks 48(1)

Worst of Worst-
3rd Down Conversion Defense 125(13) "Worst in FBS"
1rst Down Defense 122(11)
Pass Efficiency Defense 122(13)
Turnovers Gained 116(13)
Scoring Defense 97(8)
Total Defense 95(9)
Geez Boca...those defensive stas are downright depressing. Worst 3rd down D in all of D1 football!!! Not much better on 1st. 1st & 3rd down are obviously passing downs when facing our team. I know we're down at CB, but I wonder if things would be much better if Norrils and Cole were healthy...tough for anyone to make plays when your giving your opponent a 10yd cushion.
(10-12-2014 11:33 AM)TampaRocket Wrote: [ -> ]Geez Boca...those defensive stas are downright depressing. Worst 3rd down D in all of D1 football!!! Not much better on 1st. 1st & 3rd down are obviously passing downs when facing our team. I know we're down at CB, but I wonder if things would be much better if Norrils and Cole were healthy...tough for anyone to make plays when your giving your opponent a 10yd cushion.

Makes me 03-puke!!!
(10-12-2014 09:06 AM)Boca Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]Stats National Ranking(MAC):
Total Offense 16(1)
Rush Offense 20(1)
Eush Defense 23(1)
3rd Down Conversion% 19(2)
Sacks 48(1)

Worst of Worst-
3rd Down Conversion Defense 125(13) "Worst in FBS"
1rst Down Defense 122(11)
Pass Efficiency Defense 122(13)
Turnovers Gained 116(13)
Scoring Defense 97(8)
Total Defense 95(9)

Stats usually don't tell the whole story.... In this case, they absolutely do!http://www.csnbbs.com/images/smilies/03-banghead.gif
Someone post Bowling Greens defensive stats... they can't be very good.
(10-13-2014 12:41 PM)UofToledoFans Wrote: [ -> ]Someone post Bowling Greens defensive stats... they can't be very good.

BGSUX:
1rst Down Defense 125(13)Worst FBS
3rd Down Defense 98(9)
Scoring Defense 114(12)
Total Defense124(13)
Passing YDs Allowed 124(13)
Passing Efficiency Defense 97(9)
Scoring Defense 114(12)
Rushing Defense 110(12)
Fewest Penalties 112(12)
Fewest Penalty YDs 120(12)
Not that it makes things any better, but there's 128 teams in the FBS, not 125. The 125th might actually still be the worst in FBS, depending on where the 3 mystery teams fall.
(10-13-2014 08:44 AM)BDV27 Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-12-2014 09:06 AM)Boca Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]Stats National Ranking(MAC):
Total Offense 16(1)
Rush Offense 20(1)
Eush Defense 23(1)
3rd Down Conversion% 19(2)
Sacks 48(1)

Worst of Worst-
3rd Down Conversion Defense 125(13) "Worst in FBS"
1rst Down Defense 122(11)
Pass Efficiency Defense 122(13)
Turnovers Gained 116(13)
Scoring Defense 97(8)
Total Defense 95(9)

Stats usually don't tell the whole story.... In this case, they absolutely do!

I agree. The crazy thing is that without looking them up, most of would have guessed most of those numbers.

And here's one of my favorite quotes related to sports.

"Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." ~ Aaron Levenstein
(10-13-2014 04:41 PM)therockets046 Wrote: [ -> ]Not that it makes things any better, but there's 128 teams in the FBS, not 125. The 125th might actually still be the worst in FBS, depending on where the 3 mystery teams fall.

NCAA only ranks 125 this season.
Ga Southern, Charlotte, Appalachian State, and Old Dominion aren't
included and are considered to be reclassifying by the NCAA.
Reference URL's