CSNbbs

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-t...-citizens/

Quote:(NaturalNews) It is not a claim being made by some obscure personality who hosts a late-night "radio show" on shortwave, or by a known far-out lunatic seeking his latest 15 minutes of fame, but by none other than a Nobel Peace Prize nominee.

Reports surfaced Jan. 22 that Dr. Jim Garrow, nominated for the prize in 2009, made a shocking claim on his Facebook page in recent days that he was informed by a top military vet that the Obama administration's "litmus test" for new military leaders is whether or not they will follow orders to fire on American citizens if need be.

Garrow, founder of The Pink Pagoda Girls, a group that seeks to rescue baby girls from the officially sanctioned "gendercide" in China, is no "kook." He's a public figure who has been involved in "helping rescue more than 36,000 Chinese baby girls from death," according to the Pagoda website. That knowledge alone is what makes his claim all the more disturbing and worthy of attention.

'Litmus test' for future military commanders?

From his Facebook post:

I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new "litmus test" in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not. Those who will not are being removed.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038827_milita...z2IzctlaJQ

This smells strongly of supposition and hearsay. Divulge the source if it is to be taken seriously, otherwise it will be internet fodder for right and left wing pissing matches.

(01-25-2013 08:47 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]This smells strongly of supposition and hearsay. Divulge the source if it is to be taken seriously, otherwise it will be internet fodder for right and left wing pissing matches.

I understand your point. It is going to be supposition, as I'm not sure there will be too many open quotes.

But, it fits with this

http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=613...pid8854003

It also fits with the fact that for years NorthComm has been trying to figure out how to operate in CONUS w/o getting people upset. Don't misunderstand me here, not that NorthComm has been angling to shoot civilians, but rather that they think they can do good in situations like Katrina and addressing illegal immigration.

That being said, once US citizens accept NorthComm acivities, there will be a place for officers who will shoot civilians.

Big plans require long-term strategies. They are readily mocked and discarded in their early stages, then when they're in place, people are often shocked by their suddeness.

It's not like the guy is a hobo on the corner. He's a respected member of society with connections. Even if it came out of Obama's mouth people like Tom would say it didn't happen, or is misconstrued.

ie. - "You didn't build that"

THat guy REALLY needs to lay off the crack.

We can only hope Robert is the first one rounded up.

(01-25-2013 10:10 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]We can only hope Robert is the first one rounded up.

Why would I be rounded up first? I support the man. You on the other hand, seem to be one of the first ones rounded up. You don't support him and you are a fundamentalist Christian(you know what Muslims do to Christians, right?).

A couple notes on Mr. Garrow. He's not a Dr. That's an honorary degree in theology from an unaccredited school. Now we see how Dr "labia" Torch fell for it.

Also, nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize (which by the way nearly every conservative says is stupid and meaningless) can be made by anyone and are secret.

But anyway...so Obama is purging ALL military commanders who won't fire on US citizens? Okay...this should be easy as there would undoubtedly be dozens or hundreds one would think...name a couple?

(01-25-2013 11:34 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]A couple notes on Mr. Garrow. He's not a Dr. That's an honorary degree in theology from an unaccredited school. Now we see how Dr "labia" Torch fell for it.

Fell for what?

(01-25-2013 10:27 AM)RobertN Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-25-2013 10:10 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]We can only hope Robert is the first one rounded up.

Why would I be rounded up first? I support the man. You on the other hand, seem to be one of the first ones rounded up. You don't support him and you are a fundamentalist Christian(you know what Muslims do to Christians, right?).

Why do you call me a fundamentalist Christian? I don't seem to remember being involved in any theological discussions with you where I stated I take the Bible in its literal reading. Even if I were, are you implying that the current administration sees Christian fundamentalists as a threat?
Last I checked it wasn't against the law to disagree with the president or his policies. The day that those that disagree with the president are rounded up will be the day your comfy little liberal world comes crashing down. I mean, you wouldn't want such a thing to happen and be forced to admit that you were wrong all along would you?

(01-25-2013 11:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]are you implying that the current administration sees Christian fundamentalists as a threat?

They do. Islamic fundamentalists? They're his BFF's.

(01-25-2013 11:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-25-2013 10:27 AM)RobertN Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-25-2013 10:10 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: [ -> ]We can only hope Robert is the first one rounded up.

Why would I be rounded up first? I support the man. You on the other hand, seem to be one of the first ones rounded up. You don't support him and you are a fundamentalist Christian(you know what Muslims do to Christians, right?).

Why do you call me a fundamentalist Christian? I don't seem to remember being involved in any theological discussions with you where I stated I take the Bible in its literal reading. Even if I were, are you implying that the current administration sees Christian fundamentalists as a threat?
Last I checked it wasn't against the law to disagree with the president or his policies. The day that those that disagree with the president are rounded up will be the day your comfy little liberal world comes crashing down. I mean, you wouldn't want such a thing to happen and be forced to admit that you were wrong all along would you?

Given that Obama is a Muslim, that is likely.

(01-25-2013 11:34 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Also, nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize (which by the way nearly every conservative says is stupid and meaningless) can be made by anyone and are secret.

Yeah, they give those things to war criminals. Good point Tom.

W got one too? Must have missed that one. What year was it?

(01-25-2013 11:48 AM)DrTorch Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-25-2013 11:34 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]A couple notes on Mr. Garrow. He's not a Dr. That's an honorary degree in theology from an unaccredited school. Now we see how Dr "labia" Torch fell for it.

Fell for what?

DrTorch Wrote:It fits

(01-25-2013 12:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]W got one too? Must have missed that one. What year was it?

Children murdered by Obama's drones

(01-25-2013 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-25-2013 11:48 AM)DrTorch Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-25-2013 11:34 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]A couple notes on Mr. Garrow. He's not a Dr. That's an honorary degree in theology from an unaccredited school. Now we see how Dr "labia" Torch fell for it.

Fell for what?

DrTorch Wrote:It fits

Ah, you can't answer the question again. Got it. You're back to trolling.

Torch...you need to look for an avenue into the entertainment field...you belong on Comedy Central. Rarely does anyone provide me with actual LOL moments at the frequency you do.

(01-25-2013 01:01 PM)Jerry Falwell Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-25-2013 12:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]W got one too? Must have missed that one. What year was it?

Children murdered by Obama's drones

You ought to know by now that they don't care how many are killed by a Dim. Kinda like they don't care about a deficit or debt when a Dim is in office.