CSNbbs

Do we need to create a thread for every tidbit of news regarding opposition to the ballpark (even though it involves 3 local dummies)?

Yes. I was actually going to ask that same question. Wait...am I one of the dummies? Eh...I'll take it, I'm done messing with him.

In this case, yes. Merge all the stadium talk into one thread.

(10-17-2012 04:29 AM)Pyrizzo Wrote: [ -> ]Yes. I was actually going to ask that same question. Wait...am I one of the dummies? Eh...I'll take it, I'm done messing with him.

LOL. No. I was referring to someone grasping at straws every f'ing time there is a small tid bit of info that can be construed as negative news towards the park.

I only merged the common theme (opposition) with the same Thread Originators.

Seems cleaner.

(10-18-2012 12:12 AM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote: [ -> ]I only merged the common theme (opposition) with the same Thread Originators.

Seems cleaner.

I'm sorry if opposing views on sports topics upsets people in this forum. I am accustomed to other forums where people actually like to see all sides of an issue.

It seems that this forum has an exaggerated amount of what some might call circle jerking.

(10-22-2012 01:22 PM)Fitbud Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-18-2012 12:12 AM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote: [ -> ]I only merged the common theme (opposition) with the same Thread Originators.

Seems cleaner.

I'm sorry if opposing views on sports topics upsets people in this forum. I am accustomed to other forums where people actually like to see all sides of an issue.

It seems that this forum has an exaggerated amount of what some might call circle jerking.

It's not the points being made, it's that you create a separate thread for each microscopic topic, even tho they are all related.

I saw you had circle-jerking going with another group from another school. And they're not from the PAC12.

Edit- Just saw you got banned. I just checked and noone is broken up about it.